Skip to main content

Project update: November 16, 2021 -- Why we are doing this

This is gonna be a long one, folks.

Since this website went live it has been a whirlwind of activity at this end. We have been filling the room at Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission meetings, we have been going door-to-door collecting signatures on our petition, we have been researching the application and other public documents to see if there's anything in there that would put a stop to this thing.

It is at this time that a little back story might be in order.

I started this effort a few weeks ago because of the potential for the quiet, semi-rural way of life we enjoy in Skippack to be cast aside in favor of lining a developer's pockets. I mean, let's face it ... the reason most people are here is for this quiet lifestyle.

I have been a resident of Skippack Township for nearly fifteen years now. In that time I have seen the Board of Supervisors routinely ignoring the wishes of the residents in favor of developers, doing the bare minimum when it comes to informing the public, and so on. I ran for the Board of Supervisors in 2007, and came damned close to winning, too ... I fell short by 108 votes after spending a whopping $34 on my campaign for yard signs (that, incidentally, were stolen -- presumably by my opponent's supporters). My children attended from kindergarten through high school here. I have learned that, in some parts of the state, the verb "to be" has been pretty much discarded altogether (as in, "The window needs wiped.")

Still don't know what a "jawn" is, though.

The point is, I have put down roots in this soil. My family is connected to the community -- politically, culturally, economically. My wife is the artistic director for a local theater. Our oldest daughter is building a life for herself in Pottstown. Our middle daughter is majoring in communications in college. Our son is graduating high school this year and has an eye toward studying biochemistry at West Chester University. So it is disheartening, to say the least, to have the local government essentially look me (and hundreds of other residents) in the eye and say "You know what? We don't give a hot damn what you think about <insert topic here>" ... presumably because we aren't hurling large wads of cash at them.

No more.

We, the residents of Skippack Township, insist -- demand -- that our local government belong to all of us, not just Audubon Land Development Corporation and Delgrippo Homes. For a township that gives so much lip service to open space they sure do seem to be in a hurry to pave stuff over and to try to ignore the fact that nobody wants this.

I'll say it again, louder, for those in the back:

NOBODY WANTS THIS.

As of this writing, we have canvassed 136 homes. Out of that 136, 90 answered the door. From those 90 homes we obtained 95 signatures opposing this project. We also heard from five homes that refused to sign the petition, three of which fell under the heading of "I need to know more before I'll sign anything" (a perfectly legitimate and understandable response). Currently we are seeing over 85% of the homes surveyed having at least one person who was willing to sign the petition.

This strikes me as being fairly definitive and not at all ambiguous. However, given the predilection of the Board of Supervisors, "fairly definitive" is not going to be good enough.

We need a total blowout. A massive, near unanimous repudiation of this ill-conceived, brazen land grab that is designed to do little more than make absurd amounts of money for a greedy developer. It is only by making it crystal clear that the three members of the Board of Supervisors running for re-election in 2023 will lose their jobs if they allow this to go through that we can put a halt to this.

Please join us. You can sign the petition here on our website. You can sign it by sending an email to daveforskippack@gmail.com as shown below:

"I oppose the development of the Perkiomen Valley Airport property for residential purposes.

<Your name>
<Your address>
<Your phone number>"

If you like, you can drop me an email at the above address and I will personally come to you to answer your questions.

Show up at Board and Planning Commission meetings. Ask questions, and when they waffle (this happens disturbingly often) demand they clarify.

I do not stand to gain monetarily from this effort. My sole reasons for doing this is to preserve the way of life to which the residents of Skippack have become accustomed and to do everything in my power to make local government responsive to the governed.

Thank you for taking the time to read this.

Comments

  1. I'm signing the petition. But what's going on with the proposed Dunkin on the corner of 113 & 73.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Rundown

Well, they did it. Tonight at the Skippack Township Planning Commission meeting, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the conditional use permit requested by Audubon Land Development Corporation and Del Grippo Homes. This gives them the green light to move forward with the Mill Run development on the site of the Perkiomen Valley Airport, despite repeated pleas over a period of six months from nearly 500 residents that this not happen. Now I'm annoyed. No, scratch that ... I'm pissed . On a stratospheric, biblical level. Pissed to the point of wishing for each of the Commission members genital boils, COVID, leprosy, and a full IRS audit. The thing is, I'm not so much ticked off at the result -- although it does infuriate me to no end -- but to the complete and utter lack of respect for the residents, the casual dismissal of their concerns, and the use of various procedural stunts to try to derail us: The Board of Supervisors claimed that BoS meetings were not fora f

So here's what happened ...

 An update on the airport project. Brace yourself, it's a biggie. If you want to skip the tales of carnage from the meeting, you can skip to the action items at the end. Tuesday, February 22, there was a meeting of the planning commission at the Skippack Township building on Heckler Road. This meeting was very heavily attended ... as in, standing room only. The following people were in attendance: Chris Heleniak, Township Manager Tim Woodrow, Township Engineer Joe Zadlo, Township Planner Luke Dielsi, Planning Commission member Harry Greco, Planning Commission member Tim Landemesser, Planning Commission member Brad DeForest, Planning Commission member Gerald Rader, Planning Commission member Eric Fry, Attorney for the developer Traffic engineer contracted by the developer (Sandy someone, I don't remember her last name) Site engineer from Bursich Associates (I didn't catch his name) Two reps from Del Grippo Homes (I assume del Grippo Senior and del Grippo Junior) The purpose

We can do this!

Okay, so here’s an update on the effort to halt the Mill Run subdivision. Up to this point we have been hearing the standard boilerplate from the developer, the Skippack Planning Commission, and the Skippack Board of Supervisors: “A property owner has a right to do with his or her property as he or she wishes. If you wanted to develop your property, you would have the right to do so.” This is only half true in that yes, a property owner does have the right to do with their property as they wish. What is left out is the implied caveat “Unless those activities infringe on another property owner’s right to enjoy their property.” This is exactly what is being proposed: Increased traffic Further increasing the overcrowding already present at Skippack Elementary (currently at a 16:1 student/teacher ratio, higher than the state average of 14:1). Environmental damage from increased storm runoff. Increased light pollution. Potential groundwater contamination. Two weeks ago I reached out to pret