Skip to main content

Project update: November 9, 2021

Okay, folks. Here are some stats for ya.

The total number of homes being canvassed to oppose the subdivision: 535

Total number of homes visited since last Monday: 119 (a little over 22%)

Because the Board of Supervisors meeting is Wednesday and the Planning Commission is a week from today, it is clear that there is no way we can cover all this turf in the time allotted.

WE NEED VOLUNTEERS!

This isn't a hard sell. Out of the 119 homes visited in the past week, 48 were non-answers (people weren't home). This leaves a total of 71 homes where people came to the door.

Out of these, 60 homes had one or more people who elected to sign the petition, for a grand total of 74 signatures. We have a positive response of about 84.5% percent, and we have collected more signatures than homes.

We need people to pound the pavement and collect enough signatures to make a real dent in this thing at both meetings. 74 signatures is not enough to really grab their attention. Our goal is to highlight the point that, if this development goes through, then the electoral consequences for the board members will be dire ... in other words, "you guys do this, you lose your jobs."

Dave Naples will be meeting with local Republicans this evening to try to get their support. We will be meeting with local Democrats on Thursday for the same purpose.

We can be reached at daveforskippack@gmail.com if you have any questions or want to throw your hat in the ring.

We also want to reiterate that, if you wish to sign the petition electronically, you may do so by sending an email to daveforskippack@gmail. com using the following format:

"I oppose the proposed development of the Perkiomen Valley Airport property for residential purposes.

{Name}

{Street address}

{City/state/zip}

{Phone (optional})"

#StopMillRun

Comments

  1. UnknownNovember 18, 2021 at 12:44 PM

    Hi Dave

    I attended the November supervisors meeting and suggested the township purchase the airport land as a township park as I did several years ago. It's interesting to me that the old airport hangers and a large portion of level ground adjacent to them is not part of the building plan. Could it be that the land there is still being considered for a drone port that was mentioned at my first inquiry into the future of the property.
    The proposed plan does extend housing sites into or near an old pond that existed there many years ago. The remnants of the breastwork are still there. It probably was fed by a stream that no longer flows yearly.
    I will attend upcoming meetings and support the effort block this development.
    Ron

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Rundown

Well, they did it. Tonight at the Skippack Township Planning Commission meeting, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the conditional use permit requested by Audubon Land Development Corporation and Del Grippo Homes. This gives them the green light to move forward with the Mill Run development on the site of the Perkiomen Valley Airport, despite repeated pleas over a period of six months from nearly 500 residents that this not happen. Now I'm annoyed. No, scratch that ... I'm pissed . On a stratospheric, biblical level. Pissed to the point of wishing for each of the Commission members genital boils, COVID, leprosy, and a full IRS audit. The thing is, I'm not so much ticked off at the result -- although it does infuriate me to no end -- but to the complete and utter lack of respect for the residents, the casual dismissal of their concerns, and the use of various procedural stunts to try to derail us: The Board of Supervisors claimed that BoS meetings were not fora f
Post a Comment
Read more

So here's what happened ...

 An update on the airport project. Brace yourself, it's a biggie. If you want to skip the tales of carnage from the meeting, you can skip to the action items at the end. Tuesday, February 22, there was a meeting of the planning commission at the Skippack Township building on Heckler Road. This meeting was very heavily attended ... as in, standing room only. The following people were in attendance: Chris Heleniak, Township Manager Tim Woodrow, Township Engineer Joe Zadlo, Township Planner Luke Dielsi, Planning Commission member Harry Greco, Planning Commission member Tim Landemesser, Planning Commission member Brad DeForest, Planning Commission member Gerald Rader, Planning Commission member Eric Fry, Attorney for the developer Traffic engineer contracted by the developer (Sandy someone, I don't remember her last name) Site engineer from Bursich Associates (I didn't catch his name) Two reps from Del Grippo Homes (I assume del Grippo Senior and del Grippo Junior) The purpose
1 comment
Read more

We can do this!

Okay, so here’s an update on the effort to halt the Mill Run subdivision. Up to this point we have been hearing the standard boilerplate from the developer, the Skippack Planning Commission, and the Skippack Board of Supervisors: “A property owner has a right to do with his or her property as he or she wishes. If you wanted to develop your property, you would have the right to do so.” This is only half true in that yes, a property owner does have the right to do with their property as they wish. What is left out is the implied caveat “Unless those activities infringe on another property owner’s right to enjoy their property.” This is exactly what is being proposed: Increased traffic Further increasing the overcrowding already present at Skippack Elementary (currently at a 16:1 student/teacher ratio, higher than the state average of 14:1). Environmental damage from increased storm runoff. Increased light pollution. Potential groundwater contamination. Two weeks ago I reached out to pret
Post a Comment
Read more